Eastman’s later memos closely track its analysis and proposal,” the judge wrote. “The draft memo pushed a strategy that knowingly violated the Electoral Count Act, and Dr. When Pence ultimately refused to go along with the scheme, Trump responded by attacking him on Twitter. Judge Carter also summarized some documents that Eastman had sought to block, such as a draft memo that laid out a six-step plan for how then-Vice President Mike Pence to stop President Biden’s win by throwing out electors from seven states. While Trump’s former lawyer claimed the documents were protected under attorney-client privilege, Judge Carter found that all but 10 of them should be turned over to investigators, including more than 100 emails. The dispute centered around a trove of documents that Eastman had refused to turn over to the House select committee as part of its probe into the Jan. Ignoring this history, President Trump vigorously campaigned for the Vice President to single-handedly determine the results of the 2020 election.” What’s the context for this judge’s ruling? “Our nation was founded on the peaceful transition of power, epitomized by George Washington laying down his sword to make way for democratic elections. “The illegality of the plan was obvious,” wrote Carter, who was appointed by former President Bill Clinton. District Judge David Carter said there was enough evidence to suggest that the duo committed obstruction of an official proceeding and conspiracy to defraud the United States. 6 insurrection just saw a significant breakthrough: A federal judge ruled that former President Donald Trump and his former lawyer John Eastman “more likely than not” committed crimes in trying to overturn the 2020 election. The House select committee investigating the Jan.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |